A Few Ideas

With Chicago on center stage, I was mulling over what the city could do to really start to distinguish itself from other metropolitan areas and emerge as one of (if not THE) greatest cities of the new American century. Quite simply, capitalize where others have not.

Without a doubt, Chicago is culturally diverse, with all creed and color calling our fair city their home. With that in mind, why not lead the way in immigration reform. Be the city that finds the acceptable solution. What I don't understand is why you hear so many people screaming about building a wall between us and Mexico, when it would be smart of us to find a way to bring people into the system, get them paying taxes and buying/owning land. More people equals more demand for services, food, housing, jobs you name it. No one has capitalized on this yet. Everyone just tries to push these hard working people somewhere else. It's time to think about this differently.

Even though its a state issue, Chicago should really push to pass marriage rights for gay and lesbian couples. Don't wait for the whole country to do it, lead the pack! By allowing same sex couples the right to get married, we will undoubtedly be increasing our tax base. Beyond our tax base, we will inherit a flood of cultural and scientific talent that would view a major metropolitan area like Chicago with same sex marriage rights as a safe haven. This will eventually happen, but Chicago should lead the way on this, by the time it's nation wide, the benefits of being early adaptors will be greatly diminished.

Citywide WiFi. This is a no brainer. Several other cities are pushing to make this a reality, but no one has been able to achieve it. Chicago should be the first. No doubt there are large obsitcals in the way, but this will happen and like I said above, we don't want to be behind the curve, we want to define the curve. If we can achieve this, coupled with my next point, will go a long way to establishing Chicago as a technologically advanced new metropolis.

Chicago is in a unique position, we have the ear of the president elect, and if we're smart, and I know we all are, we will use that to the fullest advantage. Barack Obama speaks about creating new jobs in renewable energy and almost just as importantly, opening the floodgates to genetic research. We can ill afford to let such big sectors of commerce pass us by, I don't know any Chicagoan who wouldn't want the next Silicon Vally not to be based very close by. The benefits to local job creation and the tax base would be overwhelming. With that in mind, we should consider lowering the taxes on large businesses as well as start ups, to entice them into moving here. In the past few years, high taxes have drove businesses to financially greener pastures like Michigan, Wisconsin and Indiana. It's time to get that business back, to look at the future sectors and start making the necessary changes to ensure that we get them.

Last but not least, we have to do something about the advertising industry in this city. Last week, Avenue closed its doors after decades of quality work. Just the latest in a growing list of advertising and post production houses to close up shop. And while 'the biz' has always been a tough one to make it in, at least there was still a market to take that shot. Now with a lot of these houses going away, the talent will have less and less reason to stay here. We cannot forget that the advertising industry and the people it employs is vital to promoting a diverse market place. Talent is not always the top CEO or the highest payed ball-player. Chicago needs to keep an eye on its shrinking markets and make sure they don't dry up.

Great article

Who You Calling Second City?

by Scott Turow

How an Obama win would make Chicago the new world capital.

Chicago, my hometown, and far more significantly, that of Sen. Barack Obama, appears poised with his election as president—pooh, pooh, pooh!—to become the Center of the Known Universe. For a city with a permanent chip on its shoulder, a place that willingly refers to itself as the Second City and which deeply identifies with the perpetual failures of the Cubs, who, as I like to say, teach us to take the bitter with the bad—for that place, becoming in many senses the most important city in America will require some serious attitude adjustment.

But the transformation appears imminent. The president’s home city and state traditionally prosper from added attention and influence, as well as the influx of visitors inspired by curiosity about our nation’s leader. More important, Barack has already signaled that Chicago will also be America’s political center. In June, the candidate-designate merged the Democratic National Committee into his own campaign apparatus and officially moved the DNC to Chicago. The decision produced not only a more efficient and less rivalrous organization, but it also, in some eyes, deepened the political insight. Roland Martin, the esteemed radio host and CNN political commentator, credits Obama’s decision to move the Democratic National Committee to Chicago as one of the key factors in keeping his campaign in touch with the “real” America, by removing campaign officials from the barrage of conventional wisdom absorbed in the media capitals and the beltway. If it ain’t broke, don’t fix it. As president, Obama’s political apparatus is virtually certain to stay here.

But that is not the only reason that Chicago is about to become a place with formidable political swack. There is a kind of perfect storm brewing that will greatly enhance Chicago as a power center. The Assistant Majority Leader in the Senate, Dick Durbin, the likely Majority Leader if Harry Reid ever steps down, is from Illinois, and on the House side, Rahm Emanuel, a representative from Chicago, is Chair of the Democratic Caucus, the number four position in the Democratic leadership. Jan Schakowsky, a congresswoman whose district includes parts of the North Side of Chicago, is also a member of the House leadership, as a Chief Deputy Whip. All three—Durbin, Emanuel and Schakowsky—have unusually close relations with Obama. Emanuel, a fabled political operative, who was Director of Finance in Bill Clinton’s original presidential campaign and then a senior adviser to the president, has emerged as an important figure in the Obama campaign this fall. Durbin and Schakowsky may be even closer to the man who would be prez. As the private lore goes, it was those two who were the first major elected officials in 2005 to try to convince Obama to take on Hillary Clinton in the primaries. They argued, reportedly, that Sen. Clinton would make a wonderful president, but that she would prove unelectable in November and that Obama was the only figure in the Democratic party who could seize part of Clinton’s base and wrest the nomination from her, thus saving the party—and the nation—for another four years of ruinous Republican rule. Durbin may be the closest of all to Obama, a sage figure with a sharp political wit, who mentored our junior Senator even before his election and who, should he care to leave the Senate, could end up as Attorney General.

Not only is there an unusually strong coterie of congressional leaders from Chicago, but the city is also the home to David Axelrod, Obama’s chief political strategist. Axelrod has been the keeper of the flame from the start. Even in the grim days last October, when Hillary Clinton was blowing Barack away in national polls, Axelrod was sanguine, even in private. He reminded friends that at the same point four years before the “inevitable” Democratic nominee had been—remember him?—Howard Dean. Instead, Axelrod was confident that Obama had been handed a unique advantage that would lead to victory in the Iowa caucuses. The date of the event had been pushed so far forward in the game of leapfrog being played with New Hampshire and other states that the college students, who were Obama’s chief bastion of support, would still be home on Christmas vacation. Axelrod was sure they would arrive in record numbers to caucus for his—and their—man. They did. It is great to be loyal in politics. But it is even better to be right. Axelrod’s crystal ball has been the best in the business this year.

Axelrod is a lifelong Chicagoan—a former reporter for the Chicago Tribune—who is also close to our Mayor, Richard M. Daley. Axelrod claims that he will be staying put in Chicago, but it is hard to believe that the president is going to proceed without the counsel of the man who got him this far. Axelrod can be expected to keep the perspectives and interests of Chicago on President Obama’s screen.

The most obvious consequence of all this power congregating in one city will be not only that Chicago and Illinois will clearly get more than its share of pork, but that the fondest dream of Mayor Daley is suddenly far closer to reality. For a few years, Daley has been ardently pursuing the 2016 Summer Olympics for Chicago; the city has now been short listed along with three other cities—Tokyo, Rio and Madrid—by the International Olympic Committee. Daley has been heard to say in private for months now that the best thing that could happen to Chicago’s chances would be an Obama victory. Even as a mere candidate, Barack Obama is probably the most popular political figure in the world, capable of drawing Pope-sized crowds on every continent he has visited. Even his quiet support is likely to have a huge impact on the IOC selectors, especially since it brings with a tacit promise to lend the prestige, power and even the fundraising prowess of a uniquely magnetic and unifying figure to the games.

The Olympics will provide an extraordinary valedictory for both men. Mayor Daley sees the Olympics as the capstone of what had been almost without dispute the most successful long-running mayoralty in America in the last couple of decades. Chicago has flourished under his leadership in almost every way, far more unified, economically vital, and even boasting an improved public school system, a claim almost no other large city can make.

Obama would probably be happy enough to aid the Mayor, who has emerged as an important political ally, after a rough patch early in Obama’s career. While Obama was a young state senator, Daley persuaded the then Republican Gov. George Ryan to support important gun control legislation. The bill was called in the veto session and Obama was absent, off on his family’s annual holiday pilgrimage to see his grandmother and other relatives in Hawaii. Obama explained that one of his daughters was seriously ill and that he did not feel he could leave her. But Daley, a man of many grudges, was angered when the gun bill went down to defeat by a tiny margin.

That hatchet was buried during Obama’s successful run for the U.S. Senate. And the Mayor was a pivotal and early supporter of Barack’s presidential quest. Nonetheless, Barack’s support for the Olympics in Chicago will serve his own interests as well. The Chicago Olympics in 2016 would fall in what is surely envisaged as the last year of the Obama presidency. The prospect of the world’s leading summer festival, a celebration of world unity, taking place in his hometown cannot help but be appealing to a man who will then be intent on his legacy, especially since not only the athletes, the city and the mayor, but the president will be an implicit object of veneration.

A city that has seen its Cubs snatch defeat from the warm grasp of victory on so many occasions is likely to carefully look all these gift horses in the mouth—and to remain nervous until all the votes are counted. But even the most hard-bitten Chicagoans have to see very good times on the horizon.

LINK TO ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Test Your Font Knowledge

The best I could do was 27 out of 34.
Test Your Font Knowledge

Would it be so bad...

...to allow a truly world class casino to be built downtown? Nothing gaudy like Circus Circus, or over themed like the Luxor and its ilk. Something more along the lines of the Wynn or the Belagio. There would have to be stipulations mind you, namely that it would have to be a hotel/resort/casino. Super-tall if possible. And why not? It would be a great source of tax revenue for the city, and if it was a hit, would most assuredly draw in people from the surrounding regions. Also, out of towner's would have yet another attraction to experience. Lastly it would add yet another beautiful, glass clad skyscraper to the mix.

Critics argue that those who can ill afford to gamble with their money would do so anyway, further widening the gap between rich and poor, yet look at Las Vegas. I don't see homeless, destitute gambles by the tens of thousands.

Outdoor Digital Advertising

The market is growing rapidly, and the prices of large LED screens is dropping all the time, yet Chicago seems devoid of outdoor advertising. Why? The most I have seen is print advertising in bus stops. I don't think Chicago needs or wants anything as over saturated as say, Times Square, however, it seems like there is plenty to be made in the way of advertising dollars for the buildings. Not to mention the jobs it would create for motion designers in the city.

Beyond this no brainer of an idea. Think of the multitude of unique places Chicago has that creatively placed, well designed motion advertising can be placed. Chicago has bridges, rivers, the lake front, an elevated train system... I mean come on! Don't get me wrong, I don't think we should cover every surface with LED screens selling us crap we don't need. Nor do I think all advertising is bad. I do think though, that this is a missed opportunity to generate much needed revenue for the city.

Great Chicago Building resource

This link below shows a scale relation of the great buildings of Chicago.

Diagram

The site itself, SkyscraperPage.com is a great resource for any architecture buff. Worth taking a look at in my opinion.

Also worth a look if you have the time is the Berzon Development Database. A great listing of most proposed, approved and under construction buildings in Chicago.

What a fantastic view of Chicago!

Check it out here!